Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Your personal resource for all your frilly lace handkerchiefs, pink parasols, and general...ladies'...shit.
Fabulous Places
Two Ladies For Tea!
-
▼
2008
(98)
-
▼
February
(19)
- I would love to tell you something new. Something ...
- Atlantic
- Pacific
- Self Affirmation is Bollocks
- Me Too! Me Too!
- Marble-tongued
- Skrep
- Twelve Feet Tall
- Dread
- Nights of Cydonia and Their Sarcasm
- Sonnet V
- Read and Think!
- Androgyne
- If You Squint
- Aubrey on My Mind
- Also, Beware
- Cutest Fights Ever
- Assemblage
- A Winter's Tale
-
▼
February
(19)
Concerning Hobbits
- The Schminger
- Red and white and nearly over.
On with the Fadding.
2 comments:
Well the answer I think seems clearly to be no, it clearly violates Cartesian dualism for one, of which there is a lot of good evidence and on the philosophical level, great thought experiments.
But secondly and most importantly it would fall prey directly to the argument from reason as 'nothing more than the sum of [ones] biological instincts' would include rationality, this is of course assuming that you envision this sum as naturalistic, if not then nevermind.
If so however then it would have to explain everything as matter in motion, matter in motion is irrational, so its explanation for thought would be irrational and as such we should not believe it.
And stuff.
HAH! I actually meant specifically for dullards to reply. Not you. You clever thing, you.
Post a Comment